Category Archive for 'General Human Rights'

Welcome to a new year in the PHR student program! My name is Brendan Milliner – I’m a fourth year at Mount Sinai medical school in New York and a member of the PHR Student Advisory Board.  I’d like to say Hello to all of the new members out there, and I hope the rest of you had a great summer. As we go through this year, we’re going to be talking about specific themes each month. We want to help you to understand PHR’s mission, know what your chapter can do to help, and get all of you talking and collaborating about issues of human rights and medicine. We’re going to be sending you a monthly newsletter (check your email for October), and using THIS BLOG as a way for you to get your ideas out there and talk with people from other chapters about what you are doing. We have a nationwide network of students and physicians who are passionate about issues of human rights, so let’s start using that network

This month’s topic is ‘An Introduction to PHR and Human Rights’. Here at the SAB, we don’t necessarily know why each of you joined PHR – maybe you’ve always been interested in human rights, or maybe you needed an excuse to talk to that classmate you’ve been eyeing since anatomy started (anyone?). Whatever the case may be, we want to make sure everyone is on the same page about the fundamental ideas that form the backbone of PHR’s ideology. PHR is a group of professionals and students dedicated to using our training in medicine and the scientific method to research abuses of human rights around the world and advocate for victims. Being health care professionals gives us a lot of credibility, because we can speak to the personal impact of human rights abuses with a great deal of authority.

As I see it, PHR is an organization with one foot in the world of medicine and one foot in the world of law.As health care providers, we’re grounded in our training. We are learning to understand bodies and minds in a structured and rigorous way, and that gives us a powerful grounding in the practice and tradition of medicine. The legal side of things, on the other hand, is a little less straight-forward. What human rights are we talking about, and why do we have the authority to investigate HR abuses? The legal framework for our human rights work boils down to three critical international documents:

  • the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
  • the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and
  • the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

These three documents form the basis of the INTERNATIONAL LAW regarding human rights, and give us the legal authority to, say, denounce attacks on health workers in Bahrain or speak out about the use of torture in the US and abroad. The newsletter from this month included a video listing the rights from the Universal Declaration. To go along with that, here’s another clip outlining the rights contained in the two covenants. It’s simplified and a little cheesy, but it’s not bad as a place to start. And while you watch, I want you to take a few minutes to think about what each of these principles means and why it might be included.

Using their medical expertise to document and bear witness to violations of these rights, PHR has been able to mount extraordinarily successful advocacy campaigns and influence international law (stay tuned for another blog post about this). I joined PHR because I was inspired by this idea that as med students and future doctors we can use our training as powerful leverage for social change.So now I want to open up the floor to all of you:

  • Why did you join PHR?
  • What do you hope to get out of it?
  • What would you like to see from the PHR leadership in the year to come, or from me in the next blog?

Leave a comment below — even just to introduce yourself — and let’s get better acquainted with each other.

Avatar Image

Bahrain Releases Nine Doctors

Following PHR’s calls for the release of detained doctors and medical staff in Bahrain, nine doctors were reportedly freed. According to PHR’s sources in the field, eight female doctors and one male doctor were released late yesterday evening.

Doctors in Bahrain have been disappearing as part of a systematic attack on medical staff, as detailed in PHR’s recent report, Do No Harm: A Call for Bahrain to End Systematic Attacks on Doctors and Patients.” Many of the medical professionals are being held incommunicado in unknown locations and on Tuesday the government of Bahrain charged 47 medical staff with trying to overthrow the regime.

Last month, PHR launched the campaign, Bahrain Free the Docs. The campaign has called for the release of detained medical staff and for the government of Bahrain to end violations of medical neutrality, a principle enshrined in international law and international humanitarian law which dictates noninterference with medical professionals in times of civil unrest and conflict. In the weeks following, PHR released a report, PHR members wrote letters to the Crown Prince of Bahrain calling for the release of the doctors and PHR joined with prominent medical associations to call for the Crown Prince of Bahrain to cease the attacks on medical staff. The campaign resulted in widespread media coverage including pieces on CNN and in The New York Times as well as the US State Department expressing concern about the violations of medical neutrality in Bahrain.

While PHR celebrates with the families of those released yesterday, we continue to call on the government of Bahrain to free the remaining physicians and stop their attacks on health professionals.

Avatar Image

Bahrain Releases Nine Doctors

Following PHR’s calls for the release of detained doctors and medical staff in Bahrain, nine doctors were reportedly freed. According to PHR’s sources in the field, eight female doctors and one male doctor were released late yesterday evening.

Doctors in Bahrain have been disappearing as part of a systematic attack on medical staff, as detailed in PHR’s recent report, Do No Harm: A Call for Bahrain to End Systematic Attacks on Doctors and Patients.” Many of the medical professionals are being held incommunicado in unknown locations and on Tuesday the government of Bahrain charged 47 medical staff with trying to overthrow the regime.

Last month, PHR launched the campaign, Bahrain Free the Docs. The campaign has called for the release of detained medical staff and for the government of Bahrain to end violations of medical neutrality, a principle enshrined in international law and international humanitarian law which dictates noninterference with medical professionals in times of civil unrest and conflict. In the weeks following, PHR released a report, PHR members wrote letters to the Crown Prince of Bahrain calling for the release of the doctors and PHR joined with prominent medical associations to call for the Crown Prince of Bahrain to cease the attacks on medical staff. The campaign resulted in widespread media coverage including pieces on CNN and in The New York Times as well as the US State Department expressing concern about the violations of medical neutrality in Bahrain.

While PHR celebrates with the families of those released yesterday, we continue to call on the government of Bahrain to free the remaining physicians and stop their attacks on health professionals.

Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) today released an emergency report which documents and decries systematic human rights abuses in Bahrain. For the first time, the report, “Do No Harm: A Call for Bahrain to End Systematic Attacks on Doctors and Patients,” provides forensic evidence of attacks on physicians, medical staff, patients and unarmed civilians with the use of bird shot, physical beatings, rubber bullets, tear gas and unidentified chemical agents. The report was featured on several major news outlets including the Associated Press, AFP, BBC, CNN, the Independent, New York Times, and Washington Post.

The report details systematic and coordinated attacks against medical personnel, as a result of their efforts to provide unbiased care for wounded protestors. These attacks violate the principle of “medical neutrality” and are grave breaches of international law which dictates noninterference with medical services in times of civil unrest. Included in the violations were targeted kidnappings, beatings, and threats of rape and killing by security officials. These attacks extended to the patients of medical personnel created an atmosphere of fear which dissuaded patients from seeking care.

The report concludes with policy recommendations for Bahrain, the Unites States and the international community. Among other calls for action, PHR demands for Bahrain to immediately cease and desist all attacks on medical personnel and facilities. PHR also calls on the Obama Administration to lead an international effort to appoint a Special Rapporteur on Violations of Medical Neutrality through the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Editor’s Note: At the National Student Conference on February 12, 2011, Howard Zucker was the first of the day’s speakers, with a speech entitled Is Serendipity the Elixir for Social Change? A Physician’s Personal Journey into the UnknownHe received his MD from George Washington University School of Medicine at age 22 and going on to become a specialist in pediatric critical care, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Dr. Zucker has also worked at the White House, the Department of Health and Human Services, the World Health Organization, and at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government; he is also an attorney. He is currently the Senior Advisor for the Division of Global Health and Human Rights at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston where he is leading the team on development and implementation of a Community Peace Index for use worldwide.

After opening with a heartbreaking example of an egregious human rights violation, Dr. Zucker reminded us that “…as members of the health profession, we must work towards the betterment of people’s lives and never let anything cloud our judgment, wisdom, or passion to help our fellow human journeying with us on this planet Earth.” He continued:

Dr. Howard Zucker

To protect human rights is to guarantee that others are free from tyranny, from falsehoods that corrupt the mind and disintegrate into loss of the fundamental belief that all individuals are entitled to respect and dignity. We need look no further than our own backyards during Hurricane Katrina, or across the oceans to Myanmar, Tibet, Rwanda, Darfur, Iraq, or even China. Though the United Nations and other organizations of similar ilk seem to serve as an umbrella against the raining down of human rights violations, the reality is that no one single covering can serve to blanket us from the storm of human rights issues that we weather every year across nations on all continents.

So what role does the physician, the public health specialist, the nurse, and the entire health profession play in this? Shouldn’t the sounds we hear from the ends of a stethoscope be more than just the physiologic flow of blood through a beating heart? Shouldn’t it really be that we are also hearing the sounds of any heart in trouble from broken dreams, from shattered homes, from fractured lives?

So as doctors we must look at our role as healer in many ways. Think about this for a moment. The doctor of early 20th century America came into the patient’s room, white coat buttoned down the front, distinguished-looking, and asked specific medical questions, biologic in nature, tailored to disease. He (and invariably it was a he, back then) was rewarded for clinical acumen.

However, the doctor’s role expanded. We began asking questions about domestic violence, child abuse, and elder care. We inquired about drug and alcohol use and advised accordingly. Our duty entailed addressing car safety seats, or discussing diet and nutrition. We became involved with issues of privacy rights and our DNA; we spoke about issues of birth control, about access to medicines, and social history. The doctor at the end of the 20th century was interested in the entire patient, recognizing that our health involves more than physiology, pharmacology, or pathology.

And yet, the doctors of the 21st century, you, all of you, are no longer bound by the confines of a library of words in a textbook; your reach takes you into villages in Southern Sudan, into the igloos in remote Alaska, into the mountains in Bhutan — if not literally with your feet, then with the click of a mouse, the touch of a screen, the image on a cell phone. You are the global physician. And there is no turning back. In NYC alone, there are 170 languages spoken and 36% of its inhabitants are foreign born. Even in America you need not cross the great pond we call the Atlantic Ocean, or even the greater ocean called the Pacific to find cultures from foreign soils. If we are to become the consummate clinician, we need to be part of the shrinking world. And when we bear witness to those whose best interests aren’t being addressed we must respond accordingly.  Whether with the eyes that nature gave us or the eye that technology designed, we owe it to those victimized by inequities in quality care.

Because I had asked Dr. Zucker to speak about his experience in global health and medicine to the students at our National Conference, he also addressed how he came to be a leader in the field.

So perhaps I can take you on a journey to past experiences in my life that can serve as examples for all of you. You will see that serendipity only works when it’s wrapped in hard work and listening to the wisdom of elders.

Let me begin with how change can occur through helping one single individual life. Remember the saying that a pebble in the ocean or a breeze from the butterfly’s flapping wings can alter subsequent events. Many years ago I had a patient who we will call Jessica (to protect her real name). She was only five years old but had already had several open-heart operations and now needed another one. Adorable, funny, and smart, Jessica had congenital heart disease. The insurance company did not want to cover the operation at my hospital but wanted her surgery at another facility where they really didn’t have a talented pediatric cardiac surgeon nor did they understand the complexity of her case. So what is a doctor to do? Turn a blind eye knowing that she’ll die? Of course not! I tried the usual avenues with the insurance company but to no avail. And so I finally asked the parents for some photos of their daughter. I sent another letter to the insurance company. This time it said, “I know that you are very busy and that you might not know the patient that you are denying coverage to so I thought I would send a few pictures of her.” The first one was a picture of her in the swimming pool – and I wrote the following funny caption: “This is Jessica swimming — Olympic Gold — 2020?” and then there was a picture of her spinning a baton — and the caption read “This is Jessica showing off her talent — possibly a Dallas Cowboys cheerleader” and then there was a picture of her all dressed up holding a trophy — and the funny caption I wrote said “This is Jessica at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion — ‘I’d like to thank the Academy for this Best Actress Award.’” And then I sent a picture that had a caption that read, “This is Jessica when you deny her insurance coverage for this operation at our hospital.” And the picture I sent for that caption was that of a coffin. Within days, I received a call and ultimately she had the surgery at the hospital I worked at. Today she is a nursing student with the same spirit, energy and passion that she had at age five. One doctor, any one of you, can change a life if you truly believe you can. Do not stop when the challenge gets too difficult. Do not let any injustice occur to any patient.

It is possible to challenge the hospital administration when you believe that it is in the best interest of your patients. I could tell you many stories like that of Jessica, from getting a child on Medicare transferred from NYC to a hospital right here in Boston because I knew that the cardiologist here could do the procedure that would save her life, to other stories that caused controversies amongst the leadership. Don’t turn away from a challenge. I would sooner be fired than have to lose my integrity. You must be willing to step into unforeseen territories, figuratively and literally.

Yes, you can fight city hall! In fact, as an aside – when I was around 13 or 14 years old, I designed a recycling program for the state that I lived in at the time and sent the entire proposal to the Governor recommending that we institute this concept into all counties. The reply letter read something to the effect that the people of the state are not ready for a recycling program. That was not an acceptable response! And so I wrote back “how do you know what the people of this state are ready for until you ask them? Ask the public and maybe they are ready.” Within 5 or so years, there was a recycling program.

Remember, you are in this profession to help others. Keep that your focus. Never forget why the medical school or public health school admissions committee offered you the seat you now occupy. They believe, as do I, that you will do well for your fellow human whether it is one individual patient in a major medical center or a village of patients in a developing world. It’s not about blind ambition. As I often have said: blind ambition is when one’s ego stands in the way of one’s intelligence and casts a shadow on the brightness of all the great things that one could do for others.

We must all seize this moment to help our fellow human who inhabits this fragile Earth, for I can assure you that there will never come a time when your to-do list — personal or professional — will be completely checked off. No education, no matter the price, is worth it if you fail to generate twice as many questions to the number of answers you have received. And on the subject of failure, expect to fail, we all do, and when it happens, do not wonder what others did to you, wonder what you didn’t do yourself. I’ve had so many ups and downs in my career that if it were a rollercoaster I would have motion sickness.

Perhaps I can now turn to an example at the national level. It was my sixth day of work in Washington when the September 11th terrorist attacks occurred. My medical colleagues in New York City asked how they could help and I started wondering what citizens did the last time America was attacked — Pearl Harbor. And I went to the Library of Congress and looked through books and went online and searched files. And realized that communities came together to help out in many ways. And from that I thought — maybe we should create a volunteer group of doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, and others, to serve as a backup for the public health service. Maybe there are health professionals who aren’t working full time and would express an interest in joining such a group. And maybe if they spent enough time working together on public health projects from diabetes detection and anti-smoking campaigns to combating childhood obesity, they would easily work together in the event of a catastrophe in their community.

I believed that long before another terrorist attack occurred there would be a hurricane, snowstorm, tornado, flood, fire, or epidemic that would affect many communities and that we needed a volunteer group to help out. And so I called it the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC), wrote it up and showed it to my boss, Tommy Thompson, the Secretary of Health & Human Services. He liked the idea but I think he believed it was a bit too idealistic — though he never actually said that to me. Tommy Thompson is excellent in inspiring those who want to do well for the world! And so he said, “Howard, I like you so I’m going to show it to the President.” And the President of the United States embraced the idea. And momentum took hold and the idea was announced at the State of the Union in January 2002, as part of the President’s vision for volunteerism. The Medical Reserve Corps was born. It started out as 10 programs in 10 states with a few million dollars in federal funds and several hundred volunteers. And yet today, the Medical Reserve Corps has 900 programs, is in all fifty states, has close to a quarter of a million volunteers across the nation, with national seminars and credentialing systems. The MRC was written into the bioterrorism bill in 2005 and is considered a key component of national vaccination programs. One idea — one dream and the willingness to just try. And a tremendous amount of hard work day after day, month after month, year after year — and taking the risk of stepping onto uncharted paths, entering unknown highways of thought.

And then one day after running the program for several years I walked into the HHS Chief of Staff’s office and I said that I wanted to move the Medical Reserve Corps out of my office and give it to the Surgeon General to run. And his face turned questioning and he said, “you want to give the program to someone else. No one gives up power in Washington.” And I said, that one day I would leave DC and if the MRC didn’t have a real home that it might be lost as result of inertia. I was told to think it over during the weekend and if I was really serious then he would make the move. I was serious and the MRC was moved and it continues to grow. One must always know that ideas you conceive of and then give birth to will only grow if you give them the freedom that is needed and a new place for them to venture forth from. The New York Times wrote on the front page a year ago, that if swine flu becomes a true pandemic then the NYC health department will deploy its 8700 Medical Reserve Corps volunteers in the city to supplement the health professionals already in place. I will confess that a chill ran down my spine when I realized how valuable the program had become.

It is your duty not only to receive education by others but to send it out there as well. No time is riper for this than now. With the Internet, the ether provides the breeze to carry the ethos of medicine, public health, and human rights to others across the globe.  Quite frequently many students ask how my career navigated about. It seems to be a common inquiry. So maybe I can show you how life takes unusual turns. And how I have traveled into the unknown and came out with great surprises. In truth, many things are, as the title of this speech says, serendipity. But, as I’ve said, serendipity must be wrapped in hard work and listening to the wisdom of elders. Perhaps I can share an example of what I mean. I was working at HHS and there was an international meeting of all the countries in the western hemisphere on Health & the Environment for Children. The Secretary at that time could not go, the Acting Assistant Secretary did not want to go because there was a strong likelihood that the US position might be criticized and so I was asked if I would make the journey to Mar de Plata, Argentina for 2 days. Long trip to get yelled at, I thought. But then I thought about it more and said it would be an interesting experience even if it would require a great deal of preparatory work.

While noodling over whether I wanted to go, I turned to my ultimate confidante, my mom — wisdom of elders — and said that the government wants to send me to Argentina for all of 2 days. And my mother’s reply had nothing to do with public policy, international health, politics: her reasoning was simple and practical. “Howard” she said, “you need a new leather jacket, they have great deals in Argentina and you can get one and even some new shoes for half the cost of DC or NY.” Any doubt I had was gone. I prepared for all eventualities and when I got there I was confronted by the criticism voiced by health ministers of many nations. But my preparation paid off and I fielded the questions. Then during a break in the meeting a quiet and distinguished man walked up to me and said, “you did a fine job handling the Ministers of Health that were challenging you.” We spoke for a little while. He didn’t introduce himself until after our conversation was just about over. He then handed me his card and said, “I’m J.W. Lee, Director-General of the World Health Organization. You should come visit us in Geneva one day.” I thanked him for the invitation and said I would enjoy that. Six weeks later his senior advisor contacted me and said that the Director-General wanted to know whether I would consider the position of an Assistant Director-General at WHO. And so my path turned yet again.  And no… I never did get the leather jacket!

But let’s return to what can be done to help people on an international level. The health literacy project that I spearheaded in Afghanistan is a great example of how a few people gathered around an old table in an office can generate a talking book tool that can improve public health for those in need. In the interest of time, let me just say that when everyone was questioning whether we could convince men in Afghanistan to let their wives learn about issues of health, I simply replied – it’s the “Yentl factor.” Yentl was a movie made in 1983 – long before any of you were born – where Barbra Streisand dresses up as an early 20th century Yeshiva boy so she can learn the Talmud. Her father lets her learn as long as she doesn’t go out into the public square. Drawing from that concept, I was convinced that every man in Afghanistan would want their wife and children to be healthy and that they would be accepting of this approach – even if it meant that they would learn in private. Over 6 million women in that war-torn nation have now used the health literacy tool, the talking book that we developed. No woman should ever have her health compromised for any reason in any nation. And guess what? The men are now the ones who are asking for more books for their families to use, in private as well as public. Believe in yourself, believe that anything can happen.

I am now working as part of the Division of Global Health & Human Rights at Massachusetts General Hospital on a project to psychometrically measure peace in communities in the world. By measuring peace through a definitive index, a foundation for an entire new field of study can be laid; a domain in which a scientific approach captures the essence of what fosters and what retards peace in communities. A peace index could translate subjective assessments into objective measurements and provide a paradigm shift in how we view our efforts in improving the human conditions. It’s another door into the unknown that I feel is worth opening.

The future belongs to those who dream, it belongs to those whose heart yearns for a better tomorrow for people imprisoned by walls for non-conforming speech, or imprisoned in thought from ignorance. So for those fighting for human rights, whether in Uganda where David Kato, a gay rights activist was beaten to death for protesting a Ugandan bill promoting the death penalty for homosexuality, to those speaking out and rising up against rape and terror in the Congo, against “honor killings” in Pakistan, remember that it only takes a few people to tackle tough problems.

My dear friend, Rose Styron, was not much older than you when she helped found Amnesty International because of her convictions. Amnesty International works closely with PHR and I suggest you all learn more about their remarkable work as they now celebrate their 50th anniversary. No voice should be quieted when speaking for the rights of people who cannot speak for themselves. Torture and injustice is fueled by ignorance and insecurity. It is the responsibility of tomorrow’s leaders in medicine and policy, in education and the arts, in engineering and in politics, to pull back the curtain of bias and bigotry and let those whose lives are living in sheltered worlds of erroneousness and hearsay see the brightness of wisdom and fact.

Later, Dr. Zucker compared our potential to the innovation of the Renaissance:

I believe that our society is at a turning point. It is at a rebirth much like 15th century Renaissance Italy. That was a time when our search to perfect one’s worldly knowledge transcended obstacles and bridged intellectual divides. Students of creative thought — da Vinci, Michelangelo, Copernicus and Galileo — questioned conventional wisdom. At that moment in time the Earth was finally accepted as round and the concept of human genius was defined. Theories abound as to what caused the Renaissance. Some claim the bubonic plague of late 14th century brought thinkers to focus upon the human condition. Maybe our global economic meltdown is today’s plague, or perhaps our expanding carbon footprint, or a looming pandemic of our own. Whatever wrinkle in time that one attributes our state of affairs to, let’s capture the chance, the serendipity, and find opportunities to shape a better future. Just as Leonardo, the quintessential persona of the Florentine Renaissance, invented intricate pieces of engineering and explored the mysteries of human anatomy, so too walk visionaries who will shape our tomorrows in ways we only can dream, from human rights and medicine to technology and peace.

Could the modern era comprised of greed, famine, disease, and war be coming to a close? Are all of you the bright eyes that will take the world forward to the beginning of a new Renaissance; an era that I choose to call the rejuvenation epoch? – a time when we join hands for a better cause. The chance for greatness exists. It may be in Seattle or Beijing, Dubai or Bangalore, but it breathes the air of enthusiasm. And whoever it may be, he or she will build a new vehicle of thought that crosses allegorical oceans where the storms of uncertainty will lead to a better horizon, a new era for a new world order.

The foundation behind the Renaissance scholars was the belief in the power of human ingenuity. It was an era when anything was thought possible and hence everything became possible. The world yearns for inspirational Renaissance gurus. And though pragmatists claim that money is paramount to splendid achievements, the real currency for change requires more than dollars, euros, or yen. It requires a collective will to guarantee a paradigm shift — the vision to secure a better world for future generations.

Let us recognize that the new moment, this rejuvenation epoch, is happening now. Let this century show, when the world welcomes the year 2100, that the seed was planted by a cross-cultural society at the dawn of the millennium to cast away global trouble of poverty, inequity in human rights, a pandemic called AIDS, and a climate in upheaval. Just as the Renaissance masters cast away conventional concepts so too shall we discard friction that creates inertia in our thoughts. Let’s spawn a new generation, entrusting in you the ambitious objectives of securing a better planet.

The global populous desires 21st century Leonardos who dare to make the impossible happen in all social constructs. Let our renaissance fashion a new day for history when the world reached across societal divides and embraced a better tomorrow. The morning’s light has come and we are ready to cross the threshold into our own Florentine moment. Be that change, be tomorrow’s light for medicine and public health, for human rights, for your fellow human being. Thank you.

A letter to the Editor on immigration, by PHR’s Asylum Program Director, Christy Fujio, appeared on April 1 in the New York Times.

To the Editor:
Re “Southern Lawmakers Focus on Illegal Immigrants” (news article, March 26):

The overreaching attempts of lawmakers in several states to “fix” perceived immigration problems are shortsighted and dangerous. Many proposals, including those that would bar undocumented people from attending college or marrying United States citizens, are alarmingly reminiscent of the segregation laws that plagued our country and set an embarrassingly recent precedent for institutionalized discrimination.

South Carolina’s proposed bill, which would make it illegal to transport immigrants anywhere, including to a hospital, is particularly egregious because it could effectively deny critically needed medical care to thousands of people. This not only threatens the health of individuals, but also the public health of the entire state.

Additionally, it would place emergency medical technicians in the untenable position of having to act as immigration enforcement officers rather than healers. Health professionals’ first duty is to provide their patients with the best care possible; they cannot do that if the state forces them into an enforcement role.

CHRISTY FUJIO
Asylum Program Director
Physicians for Human Rights
Cambridge, Mass., March 26, 2011

Today is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day. To raise awareness of the issue, I asked PHR member Eric Goodwin to update us on the movement to end modern-day slavery. Eric is the founder of an organization called Human Trafficking Students and a candidate for an ALM in Government at the Harvard Extension School.

Today, 1-11-11, is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day. It’s hard to know where we stand in the fight against human trafficking. With very few facts available, the clandestine nature of human trafficking, and the competing approaches to combating it, we struggle to understand and fight it. Further, the emotional response to some human trafficking, such as child sexual slavery, can serve to obscure hard truths. The priority of economic growth can apathetically pass over the truths of workers’ circumstances. Numbers of current victims range from two million to 74 million globally.

The approach to-date has largely been a legal response with successes measured in terms of laws passed and funding appropriated. While useful, this is inadequate. This is thankfully beginning to shift. The wide recognition of the good works done by community organizers like CNN Hero Anuradha Koirala is one example of that shift, though this remains the exception not the rule. But, we’re just getting started.

The US anti-trafficking czar, Ambassador Luis CdeBaca, has noted that social movements usually lead to laws, and he said “We’ve put the cart before the horse. We’ve done the laws, now we need to do the social movement.”

The AIDS movement beginning in the early 1980s took nearly 20 years to persuade the world that science, laws, and money alone could not address the challenge. Increasingly, social science research now serves as a lynch-pin for anti-AIDS program delivery. More importantly, community integration and leadership has taken center stage in health delivery. The anti-trafficking movement, by some measures, is roughly 10 years old. But, in comparison, this movement lacks a specific identifiable pathogen to fight.

Perhaps opportunistic infection more aptly correlates to human trafficking? Human trafficking seeks out and exploits weakness. Weakness due to poverty, war, gender norms, law enforcement gaps, or a parent simply turning their gaze away from their child for a mere few seconds. If human trafficking is like an opportunistic infection, we are currently lacking an effective immune system. But, we’re just getting started.

Health professionals are on the front lines of society’s immune system and have the unique authority to act outside of their traditionally recognized roles. Additionally, students have unique opportunity to act and to determine the future of their profession. The possibilities for health intervention in human trafficking and modern slavery are currently being researched by the likes of Massachusetts General Hospital via their Initiative to End Slavery. This represents a significant step toward the wider and more comprehensive approach needed. Since we’re just getting started, we now have the chance to determine what comes next.

A collaborative of over 25 Boston area organizations have penned a letter and a guide on how to get involved for National Human Trafficking Awareness Day. This may enhance your efforts to recognize and end human trafficking and modern slavery.

Medical students during PHR's human rights training, Fall 2008.

Last year, thanks to the dedication of our wonderful PHR intern Margeaux Fischer, a donation of 441 medical textbooks was shipped to the Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights (ZADHR), with whom we helped organize a health and human rights training for medical students in 2008.

One of the ways we were able to help satisfy the needs of the students we met was through the donation of these medical texts. Our friends at ZADHR wrote about it in their recent eNewsletter:

ZADHR in conjunction with Physicians for Human Rights (USA) has donated books worth more than US$ 50,000 to the College of Health Sciences at the University of Zimbabwe. The total number of books donated is 441 and of these books 37 have already been selected for the reserve section as they are deemed very important and needs close surveillance on their usage.
ZADHR continues working with Physicians for Human rights in trying to improve access to medical books to medical students in Zimbabwe.
ZADHR would like to continue with such a positive relationships with the College of Health Sciences and they are looking for more ways they can improve access to information and other necessary resources at the College of Health Sciences.

Senior staff from the college examine the donated books.

The ZADHR student leadership PHR trained two years ago have just conducted their own training for 37 students. Norman Matara, one of the leaders, writes:

We have just held a health and human rights where we have trained 37 students in HHR. What was really exciting was that we were the ones who made the presentations, sharing what you have taught us with our young brothers. We still fight for health rights.

Norman Matara (l) and fellow students with donated books.

PHR is proud to  support these students and others around the world. We are in discussions with other US student chapters to see if another book donation drive can be put together. Let us know if you’re interested or can help!

Only 37% of Ugandan physicians are satisfied with their jobs and nearly half are at risk of either exiting the health sector or leaving Uganda entirely, according to a study published this year by the International Journal of Health Planning and Management. The study, “Satisfaction, Motivation, and Intent to Stay Among Ugandan Physicians,” is co-authored by Emily Bancroft, a former Leland Fellow with PHR in the US and AGHA in Uganda. Dovetailing with PHR’s previous works on health worker shortages in Africa, the study’s results come from a sample group of physicians working in 18 public and private health facilities in Uganda representing approximately 3% of Ugandan physicians. This study came about at the behest of Uganda’s Ministry of Health, which hopes to analyze how to implement effective policy reforms to strengthen and expand their health workforce. Bancroft’s team, headed by long time PHR advisor Professor Amy Hagopian of the University of Washington, urges Ugandan policy-makers to intervene to stem the “brain drain” that is heightened by factors such as low wages, poor infrastructure and materials, few opportunities to progress within the medical field, and regional isolation for doctors outside large cities.

14% of Ugandan physicians emigrate abroad, largely to four English-speaking countries—the US, Canada, the UK, and Australia. This number is significantly lower than that of some other countries in peril. For example, it is frequently said that more Malawian doctors practice in Manchester, England, than in the entire country of Malawi. Although Uganda’s health workforce shortage seems less drastic than Malawi’s, the crisis is no less dire: in 2008, the study’s authors estimated that there are only 2,500 physicians for Uganda’s 31 million inhabitants. Physicians, far more so than other Ugandan health professionals, were seen by Bancroft and colleagues as dissatisfied with their work and both ready and capable of vacating their posts if the opportunity should arise. Along with nurses, physicians are the group most heavily courted by international recruiters, which means many of the physicians Bancroft spoke with may already have found an opportunity to leave Uganda.

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund have exacerbated the “brain drain” seen in Uganda and throughout Africa with “structural adjustment” policies that cap domestic health expenditures. Wealthy countries can offer doctors higher salaries, greater career advancement opportunities, and, in many cases, a more stable political environment in which to work.

The Global HEALTH Act, introduced by Rep. Barbara Lee in March 2010, would assist Uganda’s efforts and help curtail health workforce shortages in countries facing similar crises by providing $2 billion over five years to increase the number of physicians, nurses, and other health workers in developing countries—and to help retain those health workers already there. The bill not only authorizes new resources, it also calls for the creation of a US Global Health Strategy to complement the goals of countries like Uganda and ensure US aid money goes where it can make a difference. This study will help foreign aid innovations like the Global HEALTH Act to better tackle complex problems like brain drain and to work with communities to solve these challenges—something PHR is dedicated to helping support.

The Obama Administration has initiated a comprehensive review of US landmines policy to decide whether or not the US will join the Mine Ban Treaty. President Obama needs to hear from you about how harmful landmines are to the health and human rights of people worldwide.

Email President Obama today and tell him to join the Mine Ban Treaty.

PHR shared the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize for our work to ban landmines. Since then, 156 countries have signed onto the treaty, which bans the use, trade, production and stockpiling of antipersonnel mines.

However, the US has refused to join. President Obama now has the opportunity to partner with every member of NATO—and every country in the Western Hemisphere, save Cuba—in supporting this critical treaty. Tell him to take action today.

Landmines kill thousands of people a year, with millions more affected by the agricultural, economic and psychological impact of the device. While landmines are a weapon of war, most casualties are civilians: indeed, UNICEF estimates that 30-40% of landmine victims are children. And landmines don’t just kill in conflict zones: there are millions of landmines and unexploded ordinances in more than 80 countries worldwide.

These indiscriminate weapons maim and kill, and destroy families and communities. The US has not used landmines since the 1991 Gulf War; it is time for us to promise never to use them again. Tell Obama to join the Mine Ban Treaty today.

68 Senators co-signed a letter to President Obama in May, showing their support for the Mine Ban Treaty. Now Obama needs to hear from you. Email him today, and ask 6 friends to do the same. PHR members have been advocating to ban landmines for more than 15 years. This is our best chance to join the Mine Ban Treaty in years, and we need your support.

Take action today!

Want to do more? We are asking major US health professional associations to sign a letter to the Administration against the use of landmines. If you have any contacts at health professional associations who might be able to help, please email Gina at gcoplon-newfield[at]phrusa[dot]org.